On March 8, 2025 I was asked to give a speech at the American Freedom Party’s conference. I decided to use the opportunity to give the party, and attendees, practical advice about what they would need to do both as a party and a movement to win. I have been assured that a video of the speech will be out sometime soon. I will be sure to share it to this post as well as on social media when it is published. However, I feel like it has been long enough wait, and that what I said should be accessible to a larger audience. So without further ado, here it is.
HOW WE WIN
I would like to start by saying that I am not a member of the American Freedom Party, but as a long-time organizer and activist, I have been invited here to speak today. It is my understanding that there has been a shakeup recently in the party’s leadership. Much of the old guard is now gone, and the new leadership will need to move quickly to assure the party’s members that you have what it takes to lead.
I have therefore decided to use this time not to give a rhetorically rousing speech, but a serious talk about strategy and what actions you will need to take to win. Given that this talk will be filmed and placed online, it is meant as advice for not only your party, but any pro-White political party be it in America or any other part of European civilization. There are of course legal limitations to what a political party can do in the United States, or any country for that matter. So, ensure to consult with an attorney before embarking upon any of the recommendations I am giving you today so that you are acting in full compliance with the electoral law.
Following my speech, I have allotted some time for a Q&A for anyone who has follow up questions. That being said, I would like to start by looking at where we find ourselves in the United States today, and how you can win.
WHERE WE FIND OURSELVES
The political ground is quickly moving underneath our feet. Trump is enacting widespread bureaucratic reform, which is widely popular. While in some ways this is very beneficial to us, in other ways, it is incredibly harmful. It will be harder now than ever for you to attract White Americans to a third party.
Several years ago, the ball was handed right to us with a state sponsored invasion, rampant capitalist corruption, perverts grooming and mutilating children with the backing of the state, endless wars for Israel and widespread anti-White terrorism. The ball was literally placed right in our hands, and we fumbled it. So why, might I ask, when the ball was handed right to us, was it dropped?
Well, as a movement, we had almost no infrastructure a decade ago. We still, have very little today. People spent decades running around in the woods playing pretend race war instead of establishing serious institutions from which we could empower ourselves. Few if any law firms, watch groups, private investigation firms, think tanks, directories, production studios, news outlets, college grants, public relations firms, labor unions, worker’s advocacy groups, businesses, storefronts, schools, curriculum, clubhouses, private communities, or religious centers were established.
Of the few groups we did have, most weren’t doing a great job of what they were supposed to be doing, and have since either collapsed as a result, or languished in obscurity due to lack of activity. That includes an organization I myself founded, the collapse of which I take full responsibility for.
THE THIRD POSITION
Prior to being called the American Freedom Party, this party had a different name, the American Third Position. What exactly is this “Third Position?” Given its name, many may mistake third positionism for centrism. However, this is not the case. “Centrism,” is non-ideological, and is the identity of the political grifter who thinks he is clever by never taking a principled stance on anything.
Instead, the so-called “centrist” looks to his left, and looks to his right, and carefully calculates what opinion, if publicly expressed, will cause the least amount of reputational damage to himself. In this way, he can always find himself on top, reaping the spoils and eating from the trough of whatever regime is currently in place.
An old joke about such creatures comes to mind.
“How does one argue with a ‘centrist?’”
Just wait five minutes!
These people are weather veins for what the elite want at any given point and time. They are a reflection of manufactured consent. No, Third Positionism, is not centrism. Third Positionists understand the false dialectic that liberal capitalist regimes establish to split the electorate and maintain their oligarchic rule through fiscal power.
This capitalist dialectic separates nationalism from socialism, ensuring the two positions are never united under one political party. This strategy weds nationalism to capitalism on the one hand, and socialism with anarchy on the other, intentionally bastardizing both. This split, generates a natural oscillation between public support for these parties.
If you want health care, labor rights, reasonable abortion laws, and an economic safety net, then you are forced to choose the Democrats, who have tied those issues to support for a mass invasion, foreign aid, all manner of sexual depravity, feminine narcissism, and White racial genocide. If you want strong borders, cultural uplift, reasonable enterprise, then you are forced to vote for the Republicans, who have tied those issues to unrestrained capitalism in the form of health insurance rackets, war profiteering, union busting, and legalized mass foreign scab labor. Not to mention the outright fanatical Jew worship! If you are to attract White Americans on any large scale to your party, you must set yourselves apart from the false two-party system.
SETTING YOURSELF APART
So, how is this to be done?
First, you must abandon all apologetics for either mainstream party. If those inclined towards the socialist side of politics see you supporting Republicans, they will rightfully see that you are supporting a party that is actively working to deprive them and their loved ones of access to healthcare, collective bargaining, consumer protections, and an economic safety net. If those inclined towards the nationalist side of politics see you supporting Democrats, they will rightfully see that you are supporting a party that is actively working to rape and mutilate their children, give their money away to foreigners, and throw open the borders. If you are constantly making arguments in favor of one party or another, no one will have any reason to join yours! They will think to themselves, “Well, if Trump and the Republicans are doing so well, why should I join you?”
The strongest weapon in your rhetorical arsenal is criticism. Use it often and unsparingly. Our people will never understand what the actual problems are, if you are constantly pulling your punches.
IS THERE THEN A POLITICAL SOLUTION?
We’ve all heard the saying “that there is no political solution.” I myself have said it, and I believe it. In my estimation this assertion is true, but it is only a half truth. In the long term, there is and will be, no political solution. We will be forced to fight for our survival as a people at some future point.
Demographically, there is no chance for us to regain control of the federal government short of the most sophisticated blackmail and bribery operation in the history of the world. Clearly, we are not going to be able to compete with the likes of child sex trafficking Mossad agents like Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Nor should we want to.
The demographic reality we find ourselves in is not a recent development, and has been true since at least the late 90’s in my estimation. Non-Whites simply aren’t going to vote for their own expulsion. Capitalists aren’t going to fund their own disempowerment.
So far, despite Trump’s promises for mass deportations of illegals, he has been deporting invaders at a slower rate than Biden’s administration during his last year in office. At the current rate of deportations, we are at best looking at deporting 2 million illegal aliens, at worst, a few hundred thousand.
To put this into perspective. There are at least 40-50 million illegals in the country. Many of whom have had children or married American citizens and will not be deported even if Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship succeeds at the supreme court. His executive order is not retroactive. This was made explicit in the order itself, which will forever establish the permanent status of every anchor baby born in America over the last 50 years.
One of whom, is the Indian medical scam artist Vivek Ramaswamy, who was just endorsed by Trump to run for governor of Ohio. As Mark Collett pointed out last month, the best-case scenario of 2 million in four years is the equivalent of the passengers on the Titanic trying to bail out the ship from sinking using nothing but buckets. Sure, every little bit helps, but things are clearly already too far gone. We must prepare for living as a minority for the time being, and we must adjust our strategy to reflect this reality.
STRATEGY OF THE MINORITY
That minority strategy, is in large part, going to be political and must work with the metapolitical, and eventually the revolutionary. It will require a political party to take power in parts of the country where White people are still a majority. Given your limited resources, you will have to engage in a type of political triage.
You cannot afford to run candidates for political offices in places they are demographically incapable of winning. You can also not afford to run candidates for federal elections, where even if they won they would have little to no power. What then should your party do?
Candidates should only be running for town, city, county, and state elections. Elections for these positions are affordable, they are winnable, and they are far more powerful than most people realize.
WHAT CAN BE DONE WITH THIS POWER?
What can be done with this power, you might ask?
You can defund government programs and grants that are anti-White.
State funding can be provided to NGO’s and federally recognized non-profits that benefit people of European heritage.
A state’s attorney general can endlessly investigate any federally recognized non-profit without probable cause, driving up legal costs for the institution to act in compliance, as what Leticia James did to Vdare.
Anti-Whitism could be officially defined, and recognized, providing the legal framework for law enforcement to investigate such behavior.
So called “Antifascism” could be defined as a violent, anti-White hate movement.
Explicitly anti-White hate crime laws could be passed.
Anti-White terrorist groups could be identified as criminal gangs, and face gang enhancements and hate crime charges when members are prosecuted.
Some states have RICO laws that would allow district attorneys to prosecute anti-White terrorist groups when they conspire to violate the rights of White advocates. ·
You can pass laws that establish prison time and major fines for employers, landlords, and banks who don’t use e-Verify when hiring, renting, or loaning to individuals.
Attorney generals can file lawsuits against corporations for anti-White discrimination.
Pass legislation that would make genital mutilation a capital offense for any surgeon who conducts it.
You can establish laws that protect children and take them away from abusive parents who seek to, or in fact give, their children puberty blockers or attempt to convince them they are the opposite sex.
· You can pass laws that allow victims of child mutilation to sue their parents and surgeons.
There is so much that you can do at the state and local level that can help embolden and moralize our people that will disrupt anti-White extremist’s attempt to genocide us. For the most part, you are only limited to your imagination. There is no reason why we do not already have control of a significant portion of these positions absence of laziness, cowardice, and foolishness.
WORKING WITH ATTORNEYS
The American Freedom Party will also need to cultivate a small army of friendly attorneys. I am sure you are well aware that once you start winning, the dirty political tricks and lawfare against you will be rampant. However, this is not the only reason you will want to actively work with attorneys.
You will need to work with them to craft ready-made legislation. Be creative. Don’t allow yourself to be overly concerned with what might be overturned at some later point by the courts. This is a strategy that anti-gun legislators have been using for decades, and now the Jewish lobby is taking the same approach to free speech. Even if legislation gets struck down at some later point, it will cost your opposition time and resources to challenge it that they would have been spending elsewhere.
If you wait to prepare legislation until you get someone in office, it will be too late. You’ll be left scrambling to put things together that haven’t been well thought out. You will get half as much passed, and you will be less effective. Any AFP member who gets into office must move quickly, and begin passing legislation and executive orders in rapid succession, or investigating and prosecuting anti-White extremists groups and businesses.
This offensive strategy will also serve as a defensive one, throwing the Judeo-Capitalist media off balance and not providing them with enough time to disseminate talking points on any one particular issue to the masses. This means there will be less resistance to much of your actions, as it will be quickly forgotten by the gold fish brained masses.
POLITICAL PARTIES DO NOT OPERATE IN A VACCUM
Now, political parties do not operate in a vacuum. Successful political parties operate alongside a major network of institutions, which collectively generate an apparatus of power that enables them to win. If you in the American Freedom Party want to win it will not simply be enough for you to build up your own party. You will have to build your own coalition of organizations as well, most of which you will need to help establish, as most of the institutions you will need don’t currently exist.
For example, the apparatus of the Republican party includes the like of investigative journalist sting operations such as Project Veritas. Once Project Veritas releases undercover video of government officials making incriminating statements or salacious admissions, it is picked up by a network of pro-Republican news outlets, such as Fox News, the Gateway Pundit, The Post Millennial, Brietbart and so-on. From there, Republican politicians then campaign on investigating the issue if they are voted into office. If already in office, they hold hearings where they talk tough and get sound bites for Fox News and the rest of the Republican media apparatus, all while ultimately never doing anything about the problem because Republicans are part of the same overarching apparatus as Democrats.
So, while this is, a somewhat imperfect analogy given there is only one political apparatus in the United States which operates both parties, using a similar set of institutions all working towards the cause of White liberation is ultimately what will be needed to achieve political power. Given this is the case, what other examples might we borrow from?
ASSOCIATIONS
Another example of the Republican apparatus is the National Rifle Association. This organization, at its peak a little over a decade ago, had around 5 million members. With 5 million members at $45 a year for membership, the organization at its peak brought in around $225 million dollars from membership dues alone. This does not include bequests from estates, or major contributions.
Among other things, with this money, the NRA has filed countless lawsuits against cities, states, and the federal government over 2nd Amendment violations. They have also acted as an insurance policy of sorts for members who have been wrongly prosecuted for firearms charges, paying for their legal fees and providing attorneys with special knowledge of 2nd amendment law. The NRA also lobbies politicians, and funds political PAC’s to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.
If the American Freedom Party is successful, similar organizations must be built. A White Workers Association could operate in a similar fashion to the NRA. On a basic level, the association could provide members with basic skills training that could boost their resumes and a network of other individuals from whom they could receive job recommendations.
White workers could also receive training in discrimination law, and learn what constitutes anti-White harassment or discrimination in the workplace and how to document it. If a member of the association believed they were subject to illicit action by their employer or co-workers, they could approach the association, who could help them find an attorney to review the evidence they’ve collected, and help pay for the attorney if it is determined they had in fact been discriminated against.
In this way, the association would act as a sort of insurance policy for White workers, while simultaneously changing the corporate culture, who in time would be terrified of the “White Workers Lobby.” For those of you naysayers of this strategy who are out of the loop, there have been hundreds of corporations and government institutions that have been successfully sued for anti-White discrimination in the last decade to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Why might this matter to the American Freedom Party? How is this helping you win elections and run people for office? Just like with the NRA, if a White Workers Association were ran by individuals who understood the revolutionary potential of such an institution, they could fund advertisements for the campaigns of AFP members through PACs.
This is, in fact, the most realistic way that a grass roots party such as yours will receive the necessary finances for your campaigns. Workers associations and labor unions in America have always been major players in politics. There is another reason why such a strategy is so powerful.
Despite what most of us would like to believe, the majority of our people are not altruistic. They are not going to donate large sums of money to your party, especially given that campaign contributors names are made publicly available in the United States, which would destroy the lives of most people and financially ruin them. People are much more likely to join an association anonymously that they are getting something immediately out of, than risk everything by volunteering their time and resources to a political organization knowing they will likely be punished economically and socially for their involvement.
Many of our people who would acknowledge anti-White discrimination and who would even seek protection from it, will never join a party advocating racial separatism. But many of these same people who cling endlessly to the false solution of race-blindness and integration will join a White workers association because the benefits it would bring them. Herein lies the genius of your party helping to establish various pro-White membership associations. Not only will these organizations be the financial life blood of your party, but you will be able to draw funding from people who would never otherwise donate or support you.
WATCH GROUPS
You will also need to help establish watch groups, to monitor anti-White extremist activities and report them to the public. Every successful political movement has a broad intelligence gathering and dissemination apparatus. You cannot fight an opponent you are ignorant of, and whose actors and movements you are blind to. You will need watch groups to keep an eye on, and report about anti-White extremist and terrorist activity.
By doing so, these groups will disrupt such activity, clearing a path for your party to hold public gatherings and identify extremists who attempt to infiltrate and dox your members. You will also need to work with the experts to understand what legislation should be crafted to counter them, and what state power can be used to shut them down or drain them of resources.
MEDIA APARATUS
The media is also a part of this intelligence gathering and dissemination apparatus that you must build.
There was a political cartoon floating around years ago of two booths at a university where students could either sign up to major in S.T.E.M. or Women’s Studies. All of the women rushed to sign up for Women’s Studies while none of them chose S.T.E.M. Then, in the final strip of this cartoon, all of the women who chose to major in Women’s Studies were out protesting in front of the booth for S.T.E.M., holding signs claiming S.T.E.M. was “sexist” for not having any women. I see our movement’s problem with the media similarly.
We can point out that the majority of the media is controlled by Jews, and that is of course, empirically true. And while naming the problem is the first step to solving it, it is by no means the only and final step. We seem to be stuck at this first step of naming the problem and not moving beyond it. The only solution to Jews running the media, is to establish our own media, not to endlessly sputter that Jews have a media and we don’t.
And while technically commentary in the form of podcasts and blogs are a form of media, they are not the same as say, an investigative news agency. The commentariat are endlessly reactive, never establishing the discussion, or uncovering new information that disrupts the status quo. On the other hand, investigative journalism is often socially and economically damaging to the target of an investigation. It forces the spotlight onto those who would otherwise prefer anonymity, or obscurity.
News agencies also establish a sort of professionalism that commentators lack, and are taken more serious by the audience. Perhaps most importantly, they report on issues from a framing that subtly shapes the mind of the unsuspecting audience over time. However, for your purposes, such agencies will be essential to covering your party’s activities fairly, or even at all!
You will want to work closely with friendly news agencies. This is something I believe the National Justice Party did quite successfully, and a strategy that you will need to replicate if you are to succeed. While we have a few notable news organizations here in the U.S., such as the Justice Report or Genesee Valley Observer, we are going to need dozens more across the country to be effective.
MEETING SPACE
You will need clubhouses, and auditoriums, where you can speak to large audiences. Venues, such as restaurants, hotel conference rooms, and stadiums, allotted to regime political parties will be closed off to you. While in some cases you may be able to use state facilities or public parks, this will leave you at the mercy of the state to protect you and your supporters. As we saw with Charlottesville, a belligerent state will walk you and your supporters right into a lawsuit trap.
Today, we are meeting at a friendly private venue, but we are going to need dozens of venues like this across the country that can offer meeting space for local chapters of your party. The people right now best situated in our cause to establish such venues would be active clubs. Though of course, these clubs will need to have a great deal of wisdom in where they establish these meeting spaces, and how they will operate security for them.
VICTORY IS YOURS TO LOSE
Victory is yours to lose. If you make the right decisions, work your ass off, stick to your principles and not compromise, victory will be close at hand. As Whites continue to become a minority, they will inevitably radicalize, and run right into your arms. How then, given this situation, can you lose?
UNPRODUCTIVE PUBLIC ARGUMENTS
Over the last few years many unproductive public arguments have arisen. The online v. street activist debate being the most recent among them. I believe this debate largely stemmed from a frustration by activists to get more people to join them at protests or to become members of their organizations.
And it is okay to be frustrated. We are all frustrated with our current situation and often with each other’s decisions on how to handle our current plight. Though when it comes to street level activism and online activism, it is not one over the other. It is both in conjunction with each other!
Creating an artificial split between the two was incredibly counter-productive. If you are to succeed, you will need to harness the online activists, and work in concert with them. Not needlessly go to war with them. A war, I might add, which you will most certainly lose.
The same can be said of the so-called “optics debate” that occurred sometime around 2018, I believe. This may shock many people, given how conscious I was of optics when running Identity Evropa. In fact, the term “optics cuck” resulted from criticism of me and the policies I had set for the behavior of Identity Evropa members. Despite the criticism I received, I did not respond to it publicly, nor did I try to change these people’s minds.
I knew that if I engaged them, it would be a major distraction, and our organization had more important issues to focus on, like protesting mass immigration and anti-White policies. I also, had no reason to engage them, because I understood that you don’t attack your fanatics, you act as a gateway to them.
I however, had decided that given the social and political situation in 2016 when IE was launched, that our presence as an explicitly pro-White activist group focused on organizing and protesting issues of identity, race, and demographics would be radical enough. Getting publicly sucked into an unwinnable public debate wouldn’t have changed anything other than the amount of time I had to focus on organizing people who had already decided they had liked what we were doing and were looking to me for direction.
Organizing takes a lot of work, and if you are busy making long winded diatribes or effort posts to convince the public of your organization’s specific strategy, you are losing precious time. The people who get what you are doing and think that is the right strategy to take will join you. Your actions alone will be convincing to them. You can organize or you can chose unproductive arguments with the internet people, most of whom recent revelations have shown aren’t even White, but you can’t do both. So, choose wisely what public discussions you are drawn into.
HOW ELSE CAN YOU LOSE?
Well, depending on the circumstance, you can actually lose by winning. The AFD, BNP, Front National, Swedish Democrats, Vox, and others are all political parties that started off far more radical than they are today. Each and every one of these parties compromised themselves time and time again on various issues, to where now they have become non-threatening to the regimes that they are operating in.
In fact, many of these parties are now acting as a subversive, stabilizing force, for the regimes they are operating in. By compromising on issues, you will neuter your party, making it impotent. This alienates serious people acting on conviction, who are the life blood of any movement. These are the people who will slave away for hours on end, many times unpaid without asking anything in return.
These are the people who you want surrounding you when you come to power, because they will not sell out. They will be far less likely to stab you in the back. If you begin compromising on issues, you will lose these people, and rightly so! I will say this right now to all of you. Everyone in this room. If the party leadership of the AFP ever embarks on a program of compromising its principles for the sake of winning, you should all make a mad rush for the door and make one hell of a mess on your way out!
CLOSING
Ladies and gentlemen, our people deserve dedicated, competent representatives. You have decided to step up to that plate. Move quickly and with purpose, yet do not act on a sense of panic. Revolutions are the culmination of decades, even centuries of intergenerational struggle. Without the proper preparations - the institutions, the businesses, the platforms, and the services - the groundwork that is required for victory, will never be laid. The sooner you begin building, the closer victory will be for us all.
Thank you.
Re: online vs. in person activism - you are conciliatory which is understandable during a disagreement with comrades, but, in this particular instance, I don't think you should be. It is my opinion that most WNs have poor judgement and poor decision making skills. This is a glaringly obvious example of exactly that and I have no tolerance for it, in general, and certainly not for those in leadership positions.